I’ve been rereading the Derek Bickerton paper, A Brief Guide to Language Evolution for Linguists quite a lot recently. Its a really good attempt to synthesize the diverse debates about language evolution into something that an average linguist can quickly refer to. Unfortunately I think that Bickerton is not very impartial in his representation of the issues and I feel duty bound to pick my way through it and give a little commentary. It is a very useful paper and he makes some excellent points, however there are some parts where I think he is promoting his position whilst claiming to be an impartial guide.
a
Archives
Recent Posts
Blogroll
- Anthropology.net
- Babel’s Dawn
- Bad Science
- Bodily Self-models & Bodily Self-knowledge
- Christine Kenneally
- Dan Sperber’s Website
- Edinburgh Library Catalogue Search
- Google Scholar
- Greg Laden
- John Hawks Weblog
- Language Evolution and Computation Bibliography
- Language Log
- LEC Homepage
- Myed
- Probable Languages
- Psyblog
- The Cognition and Language Lab
- The Lousy Linguist
- The Panda’s Thumb
Recent Comments